我在思科2801路由器上打了两种方法的命令,但都限不了速,是不是哪里错了呢?
(1)
ip cef
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any (限一个网段)
inter f0/0
rate-limit input access-group 100 4000000 80000 100000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop(数据流入时,速度超过4M就限制)
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any (限一个网段)
inter f0/0
rate-limit input access-group 100 4000000 80000 100000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop(数据流入时,速度超过4M就限制)
(2)
ip access-list extended limit
permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
route-map QoS_input permit 10
match ip address limit
set ip precedence critical
match ip address limit
set ip precedence critical
set ip precedence priority
class-map match-any WAN
match ip precedence 0 1 2
match ip precedence 0 1 2
policy-map QoS_output
class WAN
bandwidth 512
police cir 51000 bc 1200 be 1200
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
class WAN
bandwidth 512
police cir 51000 bc 1200 be 1200
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
interface G 0/0
ip nat inside
ip policy route-map QoS_input
ip nat inside
ip policy route-map QoS_input
interface G 0/1
ip nat outside
service-policy output QoS_output
ip nat outside
service-policy output QoS_output







发表评论 评论 (8 个评论)
MQC那个做法的话,针对同一种流量可以打上两种优先级?限速做的是没问题的,主要的问题出在流量匹配上,看看route-map是不是有正常工作。
MQC那个做法的话,针对同一种流量可以打
1)ip cef //这句在单纯做限速的时候是可以不开的,因为CAR还有做MARK的功能,所以一般建议打开。
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
int f0/0
rate-limit input acce-group 100 400000 8000 10000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop//这句我就是把你原来设的三个值改小了一点点,你原来的配置没有问题,就是这几个值设的太大不利于看现象。
2)ip access-list extended limit
permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
class-map match-any WAN
match ip access-group name limit
policy-map QoS_output
class WAN
bandwidth 512
police cir 51000 bc 1200 be 1200
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
interface G 0/1
ip nat outside
service-policy output QoS_output
//这段主要是把那个route-map去掉了,直接对所有匹配那个ACL的进行限速,你原来的限速配置是没有问题的